METHOD: The meta-analysis included all studies that examined the effect of prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic supplements on one or more renal function parameters and had a control group. We searched July 1967 through to March 2016 MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases.
RESULTS: Of 437 studies, 13 were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. GFR levels tended to be reduced; whereas creatinine levels increased in the intervention group compared with the placebo group, both in a non-significant manner. The pooled effect on BUN demonstrated a significant decline compared with the placebo group (MD, -1.72 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.93 to -0.51; P = 0.005). Urea significantly decreased after intervention (-0.46 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.60 to -0.32; P <0.0001). The UA levels significantly increased in the intervention group compared with the placebo group (12.28 µmol/L; 95% CI, 0.85-23.71; P = 0.035).
CONCLUSION: This study showed a significant increase in UA and a decrease in urea and BUN. The use of prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic supplements among those with compromised renal function or those at risk for renal failure should be limited until large-scale, well-designed randomized controlled trials prove the safety and efficacy of these supplements in improving renal function.
Methods: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and Ferric reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP) were applied to evaluate the antioxidant activity of carob. In vitro cytotoxicity of carob was conducted on human hepatocytes (WRL68) and rat pancreatic β-cells (RIN-5F). Acute oral toxicity of carob was conducted on a total of 18 male and 18 female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, which were subdivided into three groups (n = 6), namely: high and low dose carob-treated (CS5000 and CS2000, respectively) as well as the normal control (NC) receiving a single oral dose of 5,000 mg kg-1 carob, 2,000 mg kg-1 carob and 5 mL kg-1 distilled water for 14 days, respectively. Alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, creatinine and urea were assessed. Livers and kidneys were harvested for histopathology. In vitro inhibitory effect against α-amylase and α-glucosidase was evaluated. In vivo glycemic activity was conducted on 24 male SD rats which were previously intraperitoneally injected with 55 mg kg-1 streptozotocin (STZ) followed by 210 mg kg-1nicotinamide to induce type 2 diabetes mellitus. An extra non-injected group (n = 6) was added as a normal control (NC). The injected-rats were divided into four groups (n = 6), namely: diabetic control (D0), 5 mg kg-1glibenclamide-treated diabetic (GD), 500 mg kg-1 carob-treated diabetic (CS500) and 1,000 mg kg-1 carob-treated diabetic (CS1000). All groups received a single oral daily dose of their treatment for 4 weeks. Body weight, fasting blood glucose (FBG), oral glucose tolerance test, biochemistry, insulin and hemostatic model assessment were assessed. Pancreases was harvested for histopathology.
Results: Carob demonstrated a FRAP value of 3191.67 ± 54.34 µmoL Fe++ and IC50 of DPPH of 11.23 ± 0.47 µg mL-1. In vitro, carob was non-toxic on hepatocytes and pancreatic β-cells. In acute oral toxicity, liver and kidney functions and their histological sections showed no abnormalities. Carob exerted an in vitro inhibitory effect against α-amylase and α-glucosidase with IC50 of 92.99 ± 0.22 and 97.13 ± 4.11 µg mL-1, respectively. In diabetic induced rats, FBG of CS1000 was significantly less than diabetic control. Histological pancreatic sections of CS1000 showed less destruction of β-cells than CS500 and diabetic control.
Conclusion: Carob pod did not cause acute systemic toxicity and showed in vitro antioxidant effects. On the other hand, inhibiting α-amylase and α-glucosidase was evident. Interestingly, a high dose of carob exhibits an in vivo antihyperglycemic activity and warrants further in-depth study to identify the potential carob extract composition.
METHODOLOGY: A total of 89 patients with gouty arthritis and 100 normal subjects who consented and were recruited in this study. The serum urate and creatinine were measured. The SNP genotyping was performed using PCR-RFLP method for rs3733591 and BST 1236 was used as a restriction enzyme to cut the targeted amplicons.
RESULT: SLC2A9 variant was associated with gout, p-value of 0.007, OR=4.713 [95%CI 1.530-14.513], however this association was not significant after adjustment for age and gender with p=0.465 (OR=1.950; 95%CI[0.325-11.718]).
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the genetic variant of SLC2A9 may contribute to the susceptibility of gout among Malays in Malaysia.
Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study extracted de-identified data from the Malaysian Registry of Intensive Care in four Malaysian tertiary ICUs between January 2010 and December 2014. The study was registered under the NMRR and approved by the ethics committee. AKI was defined as twice the baseline creatinine or urine output <0.5 ml/kg/h for 12 h.
Results: Of 26,663 patients, 24.2% had AKI within 24 h of admission. Patients with AKI were older and had higher severity of illness compared to those without AKI. AKI patients had a longer duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU, and hospital stay. Age, Simplified Acute Physiological II Score, and the presence of sepsis and preexisting hypertension, chronic cardiovascular disease independently associated with AKI. About 32.3% had sepsis. Patients with both AKI and sepsis had the highest risk of mortality (relative risk 3.43 [3.34-3.53]).
Conclusions: AKI is common in our ICU, with higher morbidity and mortality. Independent risk factors of AKI include age, the severity of illness, sepsis and preexisting hypertension, and chronic cardiovascular disease. AKI independently contributes to mortality. The presence of AKI and sepsis increased the risk of mortality by three times.
Methods: One hundred and fifty hard-working agricultural farmers from high-prevalence area for CKDu (Madawachchiya) were screened three times for proteinuria; 66 proteinuric and 21 non-proteinuric were identified as the baseline classification. Selected individuals were analysed further for creatinine, protein and cystatin C in urine and creatinine, cystatin C in serum. Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UP/UC) was calculated.
Results: Based on creatinine and cystatin C cut-off levels in serum, individuals were classified as high or normal. Diagnosis of two functional markers (creatinine and cystatin C) were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and in terms of sensitivity and specificity using UP/UC as the baseline. Creatinine and cystatin C-based eGFR (estimated Glomerular filtration rate) levels were calculated, and Pearson's correlation coefficient was determined between different eGFR measurements using UP/UC. Mean (SD) UP/UC ratio, serum creatinine, and serum cystatin C levels of the proteinuric subjects were 129.0 (18.4) mg/mmol, 1.35 (0.39) mg/dL, 1.69 (0.58) mg/L. For non-proteniuric individuals, the results were found to be 14.4 (2.28), 1.22 (0.40) mg/dL, 0.82 (0.25) mg/L. The ROC analysis showed excellent accuracy in using cystatin C for identifying proteinuric patients than creatinine area under the curve (AUC): 0.9675, P < 0.001). Cut-off points were identified as 1.015 mg/dL for serum creatinine and 0.930mg/L for cystatin C. Furthermore, cystatin C based Hoek formula showed the better correlation (0.635, P < 0.001) with UP/UC compared with creatinine based modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula.
Conclusion: The study showed elevated serum cystatin C in patients with persisting proteinuria compared with non-responding serum creatinine. Moreover, cystatin C-based eGFR equations were more accurate to determine the kidney function than serum creatinine in proteinuric patients who are vulnerable for CKDu in high-prevalence areas.
Methods: A prospective observational study including 223 patients receiving the branded medicine Exjade® and 101 patients receiving the copy Osveral® was carried out. Data were assessed for a 1-year period and included clinical symptoms, serum ferritin (SF), serum creatinine (SC), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Data were analyzed with SPSS version 22 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
Results: The median age of the sample was 8 years. There was no significant difference in gender distribution between the two groups (p = 0.625). Nausea was the most frequently reported adverse effect followed by diarrhea and abdominal pain in both groups. Patients receiving Exjade® had a higher relative reduction of SF at the end of the study compared with the Osveral® group (19.9% versus 9.93%, p = 0.028). SC was found to be significantly higher in the Osveral® group than in the Exjade® group throughout the study period. The mean platelet count was higher in the Exjade® group. ALT was significantly higher among patients receiving Osveral® over the last three months of the study.
Conclusions: Exjade® showed a better ability to reduce SF, with less liver toxicity, and better hemostasis profile. No congenital anomalies associated with short-term use of both drugs during pregnancy were observed or reported.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed at Hue Central Hospital from 2012-2016 on 176 CKD and 64 control subjects. ADMA levels were measured by using the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method.
RESULTS: Mean ADMA level was markedly higher (p<0.001) in all patients combined (0.73±0.24μmol/L) than in control subjects (0.47±0.13μmol/L). Mean ADMA levels in advanced kidney disease were higher than control subjects. ADMA levels correlated inversely and relatively strictly to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (r = -0.689; p<0.001), haemoglobin (r = -0.525; p<0.001) and haematocrit (r = - 0.491; p<0.001); correlated favourably and relatively strictly to serum creatinine (r = 0.569; p<0.001) and serum urea (r = 0.642; p<0.001). ADMA elevation was predicted simultaneously by eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2 (p<0.001), anaemia (p=0.002), body mass index (BMI) (p=0.011) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) (p=0.041). Cutoff of ≥0.68μmol/L, ADMA levels predict reduction of eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2, sensitivity of 86.9 %, specificity of 82.6%, area under ROC 92.4% (95%CI: 88.6-96.1%).