Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy and Oncology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia Health Campus, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
  • 2 Medical Physics Program, School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia Main Campus, 11800 Bertam, Penang, Malaysia
  • 3 Gastrointestinal Function and Motility (GIFM) Unit, Clinical Examination Lab, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
  • 4 Aseptic Dispensary and Radiopharmacy Unit, Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
  • 5 School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 6 Département de physique, Complexe des sciences, Université de Montréal, 1375, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
  • 7 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, 50300 Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 8 Department of Family Medicine, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
PMID: 38705971 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16585

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Measurements of gastric emptying and accommodation for alternative test-meal protocol during gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES), such as high-calorie nutrient drinks, are not fully established. We aimed to compare the effects of standardized egg-white meal (EWM) versus high-calorie nutrient drink (Vital®; Abbott Laboratories) on global GES parameters and intragastric meal distribution at immediate scan (IMD0h).

METHODS: Of 84 screened participants, 60 asymptomatic healthy Asian population (38 females; 24.0 ± 1.5 years; 23.8 ± 2.6 kg/m2) were recruited in this 2 × 2 (AB/BA) crossover trial. Participants were randomized to a 4-h GES with 99mTc-radiolabeled EWM (~255.8 kcal), followed by a 200 mL Vital® (300 kcal), or vice versa, separated by a 2-week washout period. Global meal retention (GMR), power-exponential model emptying parameters (half-emptying [T1/2], lag phases [Tlag2%, Tlag5%, Tlag10%]), and IMD0h were determined and compared.

RESULTS: GMRs for both test meals were within the international standard references for solid GES. Compared to EWM, Vital® exhibited significantly lower GMRs (faster emptying) from 0.5 to 3 h (all P 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications