Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Lembah Pantai, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic address: lohps@um.edu.my
  • 2 Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Lembah Pantai, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Lembah Pantai, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 4 University Malaya Research Imaging Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging, University of Malaya, KL, Malaysia
J Clin Anesth, 2016 Nov;34:216-22.
PMID: 27687378 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.074

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of sedation with dexmedetomidine compared to propofol for claustrophobic adults undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in our institution.

DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, double-blinded study.

SETTING: University-based tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS: Thirty claustrophobic adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II who were planned for MRI.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to target-controlled infusion propofol or dexmedetomidine loading followed by maintenance dose for procedural sedation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary end point was adequate reduction in patient anxiety levels to allow successful completion of the MRI sequence. Both methods of sedation adequately reduced anxiety levels in visual analog scale scores and Spielberger Strait Test Anxiety Inventory (P

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.