Affiliations 

  • 1 Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: mlloyd2@emory.edu
  • 2 Cardiovascular Section, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, OU Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
  • 3 Medtronic, plc, Mounds View, Minnesota
  • 4 Electrophysiology and Pacing Unit, National Heart Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 5 Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Université Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Bordeaux, France
  • 6 Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • 7 Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
  • 8 Department of Cardiology, Johannes Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria
  • 9 Clinical Electrophysiology Department of Cardiology, Medical Centre, Hungarian Defence Forces, Budapest, Hungary
Heart Rhythm, 2017 02;14(2):200-205.
PMID: 27871854 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.11.016

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Micra transcatheter pacemaker was designed to have similar functionality to conventional transvenous VVIR pacing systems. It provides rate adaptive pacing using a programmable 3-axis accelerometer designed to detect patient activity in the presence of cardiac motion.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the system's performance during treadmill tests to maximum exertion in a subset of patients within the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study.

METHODS: Patients underwent treadmill testing at 3 or 6 months postimplant with algorithm programming at physician discretion. Normalized sensor rate (SenR) relative to the programmed upper sensor rate was modeled as a function of normalized workload in metabolic equivalents (METS) relative to maximum METS achieved during the test. A normalized METS and SenR were determined at the end of each 1-minute treadmill stage. The proportionality of SenR to workload was evaluated by comparing the slope from this relationship to the prospectively defined tolerance margin (0.65-1.35).

RESULTS: A total of 69 treadmill tests were attempted by 42 patients at 3 and 6 months postimplant. Thirty tests from 20 patients who completed ≥4 stages with an average slope of 0.86 (90% confidence interval 0.77-0.96) confirmed proportionality to workload. On an individual test basis, 25 of 30 point estimates (83.3%) had a normalized slope within the defined tolerance range (range 0.46-1.08).

CONCLUSION: Accelerometer-based rate adaptive pacing was proportional to workload, thus confirming rate adaptive pacing commensurate to workload is achievable with an entirely intracardiac pacing system.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.