Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung Medical Center, Keelung, Taiwan, Republic of China; Division of Urogynaecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China; Chang Gung University, School of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China. Electronic address: 2378@cgmh.org.tw
  • 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia; Fellow of the Division of Urogynaecology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
  • 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung Medical Center, Keelung, Taiwan, Republic of China
  • 4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Pablo O. Torre Memorial Hospital, Bacolod City, Philippines
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2017 Jun;56(3):346-352.
PMID: 28600046 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.04.015

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Transvaginal mesh anterior-posterior (TVM-AP) provides better cure rates in the surgical treatment of vaginal cuff eversion than anterior transvaginal mesh combined with sacrospinous ligament fixation (TVM-A). We determine the outcomes after TVM-A and TVM-AP surgeries in advanced vaginal cuff prolapse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The charts of 796 women who underwent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery from July 2006 to January 2012 in Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals were reviewed. We included women who presented with advanced cuff eversion and treated with TVM surgery. Data were analysed after three years post-surgery. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic and perioperative data. The paired-samples t test was used for comparison of preoperative and postoperative continuous data. The outcomes measured were objective cure (POP-Q stage ≤ 1) and subjective cure (negative response to question 2 and 3 on POPDI-6).

RESULTS: A total of 97 patients was analysed. 61 patients had TVM-A and 36 patients had TVM-AP insertion. Mean follow-up was 52 months. The objective cure rate for TVM-AP was significantly higher than TVM-A, 94.4% versus 80.3%. TVM-AP also showed a higher subjective cure rate (91.7%) though there was no significant difference from TVM-A (p = 0.260). The mesh extrusion rate was low at 3.1% with no major complications seen. In TVM-A the blood loss was lesser and the operation time was shorter.

CONCLUSION: TVM-AP showed better objective cure rate than TVM-A at 52 months. However, TVM-A is less invasive in comparison with an acceptably good cure rates.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.