Affiliations 

  • 1 Integrative Medicine Cluster, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Bertam,13200 Kepala Batas, Penang, Malaysia; Department of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
  • 2 Integrative Medicine Cluster, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Bertam,13200 Kepala Batas, Penang, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
  • 4 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
  • 5 School of Chemical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 USM, Penang, Malaysia
  • 6 School of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia
  • 7 Integrative Medicine Cluster, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Bertam,13200 Kepala Batas, Penang, Malaysia. Electronic address: noorfatimah@usm.my
Talanta, 2019 Jul 01;199:522-531.
PMID: 30952293 DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.02.096

Abstract

Molecularly imprinted silica gel (MISG) was incorporated through dispersion in agarose polymer matrix to form a mixed matrix membrane (MMM) and was applied for the determination of three sulfonamide antibiotic compounds (i.e. sulfamethoxazole (SMX), sulfamonomethoxine (SMM), and sulfadiazine (SDZ)) from environmental water samples. Several important microextraction conditions, such as type of desorption solvent, extraction time, amount of sorbent, sample volume, pH, and effect of desorption time, were comprehensively optimized. A preconcentration factors of ≥ 20 was achieved by the extraction of 12.5 mL of water samples using the developed method. This microextraction-HPLC method demonstrated good linearity (1-500 μg L-1) with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9959-0.9999, low limits of detection (0.06-0.17 μg L-1) and limits of quantification (0.20-0.56 μg L-1), good analyte recoveries (80-96%), and acceptable relative standard deviations (< 10%) under the optimized conditions. The method is systematically compared to those reported in the literature.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications