METHODS: A prospective 12-week study using linagliptin 5mg once daily in 50 subjects (28 prediabetes and 22 T2D) who were stratified into high versus low fasting GLP-1 groups. A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed at week 0 and 12. Primary outcomes were changes in HbA1c, fasting and post-OGTT glucose after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in insulin resistance and beta cell function indices.
RESULTS: There was a greater HbA1c reduction in subjects with high GLP-1 compared to low GLP-1 levels in both the prediabetes and T2D populations [least-squares mean (LS-mean) change of -0.33% vs. -0.11% and -1.48% vs. -0.90% respectively)]. Linagliptin significantly reduced glucose excursion by 18% in high GLP-1 compared with 8% in low GLP-1 prediabetes groups. The reduction in glucose excursion was greater in high GLP-1 compared to low GLP-1 T2D by 30% and 21% respectively. There were significant LS-mean between-group differences in fasting glucose (-0.95 mmol/L), 2-hour glucose post-OGTT (-2.4 mmol/L) in the high GLP-1 T2D group. Improvement in insulin resistance indices were seen in the high GLP-1 T2D group while high GLP-1 prediabetes group demonstrated improvement in beta cell function indices. No incidence of hypoglycemia was reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Linagliptin resulted in a greater HbA1c reduction in the high GLP-1 prediabetes and T2D compared to low GLP-1 groups. Endogenous GLP-1 level play an important role in determining the efficacy of DPP-IV inhibitors irrespective of the abnormal glucose tolerance states.
METHOD: In a retrospective analysis, 237 patients diagnosed with high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) underwent prostate enucleation using three different groups of surgical instruments at the Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University. These groups included the red laser device group (n = 67), the green laser device group (n = 61), and the plasma device group (n = 109). The study evaluated changes in prostate mass, blood loss, operation time, and postoperative efficacy at 1- and 6-month intervals, as well as any associated complications.
RESULTS: The red and green laser surgical instrument groups demonstrated superiority over the plasma group in several aspects. (1) Operation Time: *1* Red laser group: 87.9 ± 14.7 minutes; *1* Green laser group: 86.1 ± 15.3 minutes. (2) Blood Loss: *1* Red laser group: 30.1 ± 5.9 mL; *2*Green laser group: 30.9 ± 6.1 mL. (3) Temporary Urinary Incontinence: *1*Red laser group: 3 cases (4.48%); *2*Green laser group: 2 cases (3.28%). These differences were statistically significant. Additionally, postoperative indicators such as IPSS(International Prostate Prostate Symptom Score), QoL(Quality of Life), Q max(The Maximum Flow Rate), and RUV(Residual Urine Volume) showed significant improvement in all three groups compared to the preoperative state.
CONCLUSION: Red laser, green laser and plasma surgical devices were safe and effective in the treatment of high critical benign prostatic hyperplasia; laser surgical devices showed better performance in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding and complications.
METHODS: We used data from 1108 population-representative studies with 141 million participants aged 18 years and older with measurements of fasting glucose and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and information on diabetes treatment. We defined diabetes as having a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) of 7·0 mmol/L or higher, having an HbA1c of 6·5% or higher, or taking medication for diabetes. We defined diabetes treatment as the proportion of people with diabetes who were taking medication for diabetes. We analysed the data in a Bayesian hierarchical meta-regression model to estimate diabetes prevalence and treatment.
FINDINGS: In 2022, an estimated 828 million (95% credible interval [CrI] 757-908) adults (those aged 18 years and older) had diabetes, an increase of 630 million (554-713) from 1990. From 1990 to 2022, the age-standardised prevalence of diabetes increased in 131 countries for women and in 155 countries for men with a posterior probability of more than 0·80. The largest increases were in low-income and middle-income countries in southeast Asia (eg, Malaysia), south Asia (eg, Pakistan), the Middle East and north Africa (eg, Egypt), and Latin America and the Caribbean (eg, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, and Costa Rica). Age-standardised prevalence neither increased nor decreased with a posterior probability of more than 0·80 in some countries in western and central Europe, sub-Saharan Africa, east Asia and the Pacific, Canada, and some Pacific island nations where prevalence was already high in 1990; it decreased with a posterior probability of more than 0·80 in women in Japan, Spain, and France, and in men in Nauru. The lowest prevalence in the world in 2022 was in western Europe and east Africa for both sexes, and in Japan and Canada for women, and the highest prevalence in the world in 2022 was in countries in Polynesia and Micronesia, some countries in the Caribbean and the Middle East and north Africa, as well as Pakistan and Malaysia. In 2022, 445 million (95% CrI 401-496) adults aged 30 years or older with diabetes did not receive treatment (59% of adults aged 30 years or older with diabetes), 3·5 times the number in 1990. From 1990 to 2022, diabetes treatment coverage increased in 118 countries for women and 98 countries for men with a posterior probability of more than 0·80. The largest improvement in treatment coverage was in some countries from central and western Europe and Latin America (Mexico, Colombia, Chile, and Costa Rica), Canada, South Korea, Russia, Seychelles, and Jordan. There was no increase in treatment coverage in most countries in sub-Saharan Africa; the Caribbean; Pacific island nations; and south, southeast, and central Asia. In 2022, age-standardised treatment coverage was lowest in countries in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia, and treatment coverage was less than 10% in some African countries. Treatment coverage was 55% or higher in South Korea, many high-income western countries, and some countries in central and eastern Europe (eg, Poland, Czechia, and Russia), Latin America (eg, Costa Rica, Chile, and Mexico), and the Middle East and north Africa (eg, Jordan, Qatar, and Kuwait).
INTERPRETATION: In most countries, especially in low-income and middle-income countries, diabetes treatment has not increased at all or has not increased sufficiently in comparison with the rise in prevalence. The burden of diabetes and untreated diabetes is increasingly borne by low-income and middle-income countries. The expansion of health insurance and primary health care should be accompanied with diabetes programmes that realign and resource health services to enhance the early detection and effective treatment of diabetes.
FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council, UK Research and Innovation (Research England), and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This descriptive retrospective study featured 221 patients diagnosed with clinically critical COVID-19 from August 2021 to March 2022 in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of RSUP Dr. M. Djamil, Padang, Indonesia. The study employed a total sampling technique to collect data from medical records in the hospital. Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent testing for leukocytes, platelets, neutrophils, and lymphocytes were included in the study. We analysed the data using descriptive univariate analysis. Then, the NLR and PLR of the patients were statistically compared based on comorbidities and coincidence.
RESULTS: According to the study, most patients with critically ill COVID-19 exhibited high levels of NLR (88.2%) and PLR (71.1%). The severe COVID-19 patients with comorbidity of kidney disease had the highest NLR (Mean ± SD) of 31.74 ± 27.95 (p-value <0.001) and the highest mean PLR (Mean ± SD) of 469.33 ± 362.95 (p-value 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our findings showed a significantly higher NLR and PLR in patients with critically ill COVID-19, particularly in patients with comorbidity of kidney disease. Thus, elevated levels of NLR and PLR were identified as potential prognostic markers for predicting disease severity in COVID-19 patients, especially those with kidney comorbidity.
METHODS: BELIEVE was a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study performed at 65 sites in 15 countries. The trial included adults with transfusion-dependent β-thalassaemia or haemoglobin E/β-thalassaemia and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0-1. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using integrated response technology stratified by region to luspatercept (1·0-1·25 mg/kg) or placebo administered subcutaneously once every 21 days. After study unblinding, patients could receive luspatercept in the open-label extension phase (crossover allowed). The primary endpoint results (proportion of patients with reduction in transfusion burden of ≥33% and ≥2 RBC units during weeks 13-24) are described elsewhere; herein we present an update to the primary endpoint analysis consequent to late-reported transfusion events. We also report long-term efficacy (intention-to-treat population) and safety data (safety population) for patients followed up for approximately 3 years. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02604433) and is completed.
FINDINGS: Between May 2, 2016, and May 16, 2017, 336 patients were randomly assigned to luspatercept (n=224) or placebo (n=112). The median age of patients was 30 years (IQR 23-40); 195 (58%) were female and 141 (42%) male. As of Jan 5, 2021, the median duration of treatment in the luspatercept group was 153·6 weeks (IQR 81·0-171·0) and median study follow-up was 163·1 weeks (140·5-176·2). Due to the difference in treatment duration between the luspatercept and placebo groups, no comparative analyses between the two groups were performed after week 96. Patients in the luspatercept group showed a sustained reduction in RBC transfusion burden from baseline through week 192, with mean decreases of 6·2 RBC units (SD 5·7) during weeks 97-144 and 6·4 RBC units (4·3) during weeks 145-192. In the luspatercept group, a 33% or greater reduction in transfusion burden from baseline was observed in 173 (77%) patients over any 12-week interval and in 116 (52%) patients over any 24-week interval. The median total duration of 33% or greater transfusion burden reduction response during any period of at least 12 weeks was 586·0 days (IQR 264·0-1010·0). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) among all patients who received luspatercept (n=315, including 92 patients who crossed over after study unblinding) were anaemia (nine [3%]), increased liver iron concentration (seven [2%]), and bone pain (seven [2%]); serious TEAEs occurred in 71 (23%) patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred in any group during the study.
INTERPRETATION: These long-term results affirm luspatercept's efficacy in addressing key unmet needs of patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassaemia with a manageable safety profile.
FUNDING: Celgene and Acceleron Pharma.