Affiliations 

  • 1 International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 2 Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA
  • 3 Department of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • 4 Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • 5 J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, San Diego, USA
  • 6 Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. botelho@hku.hk
Sci Rep, 2019 12 10;9(1):18761.
PMID: 31822712 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55056-3

Abstract

Routine postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended for third molar extractions. However, amoxicillin still continues to be used customarily in several clinical practices worldwide to prevent infections. A prospective cohort study was conducted in cohorts who underwent third molar extractions with (group EA, n = 20) or without (group E, n = 20) amoxicillin (250 mg three times daily for 5 days). Further, a control group without amoxicillin and extractions (group C, n = 17) was included. Salivary samples were collected at baseline, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-weeks and 3 months to assess the bacterial shift and antibiotic resistance gene changes employing 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Illumina-Miseq) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. A further 6-month follow-up was performed for groups E and EA. Seven operational taxonomic units reported a significant change from baseline to 3 months for group EA (adjusted p  0.05). In conclusion, the salivary microbiome is resilient to an antibiotic challenge by a low-dose regimen of amoxicillin. Further studies evaluating the effect of routinely used higher dose regimens of amoxicillin on gram-negative bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes are warranted.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.