Affiliations 

  • 1 University of Birmingham Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Fakulti Farmasi, Universiti Teknologi MARA Kampus Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 2 University of Birmingham Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • 3 University of Birmingham Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: ivanalutchman@rcsi.ie
  • 4 Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. Electronic address: Gregory.Lip@liverpool.ac.uk
  • 5 Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. Electronic address: deirdre.lane@liverpool.ac.uk
Thromb Res, 2020 08;192:12-20.
PMID: 32416364 DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is optimised in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients when the International Normalised Ratio (INR) is 2.0-3.0. Anticoagulation control comparing different ethnic groups is limited, although epidemiological studies suggest poorer INR control in non-white cohorts.

METHODS: VKA control was assessed retrospectively by time-in-the-therapeutic range (TTR) (Rosendaal method) and percentage INR-in-range (PINRR) in 991 White, Afro-Caribbean and South-Asian AF patients [overall mean (SD) age 71.6 (9.4) years; 55% male; mean (SD) CHA2DS2-VASc score 3.4 (1.6)] over a median (IQR) follow-up of 5.2 (3.2-7.0) years.

RESULTS: Compared to Whites, mean (SD) TTR and PINRR were significantly lower in South-Asians [TTR 67.9% vs. 60.5%; PINRR 58.8% vs. 51.6%, respectively] and Afro-Caribbeans [TTR 67.9% vs. 61.3%; PINRR 58.8% vs. 53.1%, respectively], despite similar INR monitoring intensity. Logistic regression revealed non-white ethnicity [OR 2.62; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] (1.67-4.10) and OR 3.47 (1.44-8.34)] and anaemia [OR 1.65 (1.00-2.70) and OR 6.27 (1.89-20.94)] as independent predictors of both TTR and PINRR 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.