METHODS: HCAECs were stimulated for 24 hours (h) with 200 µg/ml of Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and different concentrations of NSO (55, 110, 220, 440 µg/ml) or TQ (4.5, 9.0, 18.0, 36.0 µm). The effects of NSO and TQ on gene and protein expressions were measured using multiplex gene assay and ELISA assay, respectively. Rose Bengal assay was used to analyse monocyte binding activity.
RESULTS: NSO and TQ significantly reduced ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 gene and protein expressions. TQ showed significant reduction activity of the biomarkers in dose dependent manner. HCAECs pre-treated with NSO and TQ for 24 h significantly lowered monocytes adherence compared to non-treated HCAECs.
CONCLUSIONS: NSO and TQ supplementation have anti-atherogenic properties and inhibit monocytes' adherence to HCAECs via down-regulation of ICAM-1 expression. NSO could potentially be incorporated in standard treatment regimens to prevent atherosclerosis and its related complications.
OBJECTIVES: Therefore, this study aims to evaluate and compare the antiviral effects of curcumin, BDHBC, and DHHPD in an in vitro model of RV infection.
METHODS: The inhibitory effects on RV-16 infection in H1 HeLa cells were assessed using cytopathic effect (CPE) reduction assay, virus yield reduction assay, RT-qPCR, and Western blot. Antiviral effects in different modes of treatment (pre-, co-, and post-treatment) were also compared. Additionally, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) expression, RV binding, and infectivity were measured with Western blot, flow cytometry, and virucidal assay, respectively.
RESULTS: When used as a post-treatment, BDHBC (EC50: 4.19 µM; SI: 8.32) demonstrated stronger antiviral potential on RV-16 compared to DHHPD (EC50: 18.24 µM; SI: 1.82) and curcumin (less than 50% inhibition). BDHBC also showed the strongest inhibitory effect on RV-induced CPE, virus yield, vRNA, and viral proteins (P1, VP0, and VP2). Furthermore, BDHBC pre-treatment has a prophylactic effect against RV infection, which was attributed to reduced basal expression of ICAM-1. However, it did not affect virus binding, but exerted virucidal activity on RV-16, contributing to its antiviral effect during co-treatment.
CONCLUSION: BDHBC exhibits multiple antiviral mechanisms against RV infection and thus could be a potential antiviral agent for RV.
RESULTS: Anti-ICAM-1 and CD36 monoclonal antibodies were able to inhibit and reverse P. falciparum binding of lab and recently adapted patient isolates in vitro. However, reversal of binding was incomplete and varied in its efficiency between parasite isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that, as a proof of concept, disturbing existing ligand-receptor interactions is possible and could have potential therapeutic value for severe malaria. The variation seen in the degree of reversing existing binding with different parasite isolates and the incomplete nature of reversal, despite the use of high affinity inhibitors, suggest that anti-adhesion approaches as adjunct therapies for severe malaria may not be effective, and the focus may need to be on inhibitory approaches such as vaccines.