METHODS: A nanosuspension was prepared using high pressure homogenization (HPH) techniques. The physico-chemical properties of the kaempferol nanosuspension (KNS) were characterized using photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS), transmission electron microscope (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and x-ray diffractometry (XRD). A reversephase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method for the analysis of the drug in rat plasma was developed and validated as per ICH guidelines. In vivo pharmacokinetic parameters of oral pure kaempferol solution, oral kaempferol nanosuspension and intravenous pure kaempferol were assessed in rats.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The kaempferol nanosuspension had a greatly reduced particle size (426.3 ± 5.8 nm), compared to that of pure kaempferol (1737 ± 129 nm). The nanosuspension was stable under refrigerated conditions. No changes in physico-chemical characteristics were observed. In comparison to pure kaempferol, kaempferol nanosuspension exhibited a significantly (P<0.05) increased in Cmax and AUC(0-∞) following oral administration and a significant improvement in absolute bioavailability (38.17%) compared with 13.03% for pure kaempferol.
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate enhanced oral bioavailability of kaempferol when formulated as a nanosuspension.
METHODS: Data from 43 lung transplant recipients (1021 tacrolimus concentrations) administered an immediate-release oral formulation of tacrolimus were used to evaluate the predictive performance of 17 published population pharmacokinetic models for tacrolimus. Data were collected from immediately after transplantation up to 90 days after transplantation. Model performance was evaluated using (1) prediction-based assessments (bias and imprecision) of individual predicted tacrolimus concentrations at the fourth dosing based on 1 to 3 previous dosings and (2) simulation-based assessment (prediction-corrected visual predictive check; pcVPC). Both assessments were stratified based on concomitant azole antifungal use. Model performance was clinically acceptable if the bias was within ±20%, imprecision was ≤20%, and the 95% confidence interval of bias crossed zero.
RESULTS: In the presence of concomitant antifungal therapy, no model showed acceptable performance in predicting tacrolimus concentrations at the fourth dosing (n = 33), and pcVPC plots displayed poor model fit to the data set. However, this fit slightly improved in the absence of azole antifungal use, where 4 models showed acceptable performance in predicting tacrolimus concentrations at the fourth dosing (n = 33).
CONCLUSIONS: Although none of the evaluated models were appropriate in guiding tacrolimus dosing in lung transplant recipients receiving concomitant azole antifungal therapy, 4 of these models displayed potential applicability in guiding dosing in recipients not receiving concomitant azole antifungal therapy. However, further model refinement is required before the widespread implementation of such models in clinical practice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis of metformin and sildenafil (SIL) from rat plasma was done by high performance liquid chromatography. Optimum chromatographic separation and quantification of MET, SIL and Cetirizine was achieved on Phenomenex EVO C18 column with triethyl amine (0.3%): Methanol: Acetonitrile (70:05:25 v/v) as mobile phase maintaining flow rate of 1 ml/min, the detector was tuned at 224 nm. The extraction of MET and sildenafil from rat plasma was achieved by solid-phase extraction using Strata-X cartridges. The method was validated as per the ICH guidelines. For docking studies, the crystal structure of organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) protein and multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) protein (5XJJ) were downloaded from the PubChem database. The docking study was performed by PyRx virtual screening software, and the results were analyzed by BIOVIA Discovery Studio.
RESULTS: The validation of HPLC method was done, intraday and interday precision study of HPLC method demonstrated %RSD values less than 5%, the extraction recovery for MET and SIL were near to 80 % for low, medium and high QC samples. The plasma stability of MET and SIL showed % RSD values <10% for low, medium, and high QC samples. A sensitivity study for MET and SIL in rat plasma suggested a lower limit of quantification values of 8 and 10 ng/mL, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters were recorded, Cmax of experimental and control rats was 611.2 and 913.2 ng/mL; t1/2 1.66 and 1.98, AUC (0-t) 1637.5 and 2727.24, AUC (0-∞) 1832.38 and 2995.24 for MET. The results suggested that the Cmax of MET in experimental rats (MET + SIL) was 33.07% lower than the control (MET only) and also the t1/2 was 0.32 h shorter. Docking analysis suggested a higher binding affinity of sildenafil with MATE protein (5XJJ) compared to OCT1, suggesting possible involvement of MATE family proteins for pharmacokinetic alterations of MET.
CONCLUSIONS: The HPLC and solid-phase extraction method were developed and applied successfully for the pharmacokinetics of MET and SIL. Intake of SIL altered the pharmacokinetics of MET in rats. Molecular docking studies suggested the involvement of MATE family proteins for alterations of MET pharmacokinetics.