DESIGN: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL were systematically searched (1990-April 2020) for studies describing the prevalence of NP and PS in knee and hip osteoarthritis using self-report questionnaires. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Statistical heterogeneity between studies and sub-groups (affected joint and population source as a proxy for disease severity) was assessed (I2 statistic and the Chi-squared test).
RESULTS: From 2,706 non-duplicated references, 39 studies were included (2011-2020). Thirty-six studies reported on knee pain and six on hip pain. For knee osteoarthritis, the pooled prevalence of NP was: using PainDETECT, possible NP(score ≥13) 40% (95%CI 32-48%); probable NP(score >18) 20% (95%CI 15-24%); using Self-Report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs, 32% (95%CI 26-38%); using Douleur Neuropathique (DN4) 41% (95% CI 24-59%). The prevalence of PS using Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) was 36% (95% CI 12-59%). For hip osteoarthritis, the pooled prevalence of NP was: using PainDETECT, possible NP 29% (95%CI 22-37%%); probable NP 9% (95%CI 6-13%); using DN4 22% (95%CI 12-31%) in one study. The prevalence of possible NP pain was higher at the knee (40%) than the hip (29%) (difference 11% (95% CI 0-22%), P = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Using self-report questionnaire tools, NP was more prevalent in knee than hip osteoarthritis. The prevalence of NP in knee and hip osteoarthritis were similar for each joint regardless of study population source or tool used. Whether defining NP using self-report questionnaires enables more effective targeted therapy in osteoarthritis requires investigation.
METHODS: In silico target prediction was first employed to predict the probability of the bromophenols interacting with key protein targets based on a model trained on known bioactivity data and chemical similarity considerations. Next, we tested the functional effect of natural bromophenols from Symphyocladia latiuscula on the CCK2 receptor followed by a molecular docking simulation to predict interactions between a compound and the binding site of the target protein.
RESULTS: Results of cell-based functional G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) assays demonstrate that bromophenols 2,3,6-tribromo-4,5-dihydroxybenzyl alcohol (1), 2,3,6-tribromo-4,5-dihydroxybenzyl methyl ether (2), and bis-(2,3,6-tribromo-4,5-dihydroxybenzyl) ether (3) are full CCK2 antagonists. Molecular docking simulation of 1‒3 with CCK2 demonstrated strong binding by means of interaction with prime interacting residues: Arg356, Asn353, Val349, His376, Phe227, and Pro210. Simulation results predicted good binding scores and interactions with prime residues, such as the reference antagonist YM022.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest bromophenols 1-3 are CCK2R antagonists that could be novel therapeutic agents for CCK2R-related diseases, especially anxiety and depression.