Sullivan MJ 1 , Talbot J 1 , Lewis SL 1 , Phillips OL 1 , Qie L 1 , Begne SK 1 Show all authors , Chave J 2 , Cuni-Sanchez A 3 , Hubau W 1 , Lopez-Gonzalez G 1 , Miles L 4 , Monteagudo-Mendoza A 5 , Sonké B 6 , Sunderland T 7 , Ter Steege H 8 , White LJ 9 , Affum-Baffoe K 10 , Aiba SI 11 , de Almeida EC 12 , de Oliveira EA 13 , Alvarez-Loayza P 14 , Dávila EÁ 15 , Andrade A 16 , Aragão LE 17 , Ashton P 18 , Aymard C GA 19 , Baker TR 1 , Balinga M 20 , Banin LF 21 , Baraloto C 22 , Bastin JF 23 , Berry N 24 , Bogaert J 25 , Bonal D 26 , Bongers F 27 , Brienen R 1 , Camargo JL 28 , Cerón C 29 , Moscoso VC 30 , Chezeaux E 31 , Clark CJ 32 , Pacheco ÁC 33 , Comiskey JA 34 , Valverde FC 35 , Coronado EN 36 , Dargie G 1 , Davies SJ 37 , De Canniere C 38 , Djuikouo K MN 39 , Doucet JL 40 , Erwin TL 41 , Espejo JS 30 , Ewango CE 42 , Fauset S 1 , Feldpausch TR 17 , Herrera R 43 , Gilpin M 1 , Gloor E 1 , Hall JS 44 , Harris DJ 45 , Hart TB 46 , Kartawinata K 47 , Kho LK 48 , Kitayama K 49 , Laurance SG 50 , Laurance WF 50 , Leal ME 51 , Lovejoy T 52 , Lovett JC 1 , Lukasu FM 53 , Makana JR 42 , Malhi Y 54 , Maracahipes L 55 , Marimon BS 13 , Junior BH 13 , Marshall AR 56 , Morandi PS 13 , Mukendi JT 53 , Mukinzi J 42 , Nilus R 57 , Vargas PN 30 , Camacho NC 30 , Pardo G 58 , Peña-Claros M 27 , Pétronelli P 59 , Pickavance GC 1 , Poulsen AD 60 , Poulsen JR 32 , Primack RB 61 , Priyadi H 7 , Quesada CA 16 , Reitsma J 62 , Réjou-Méchain M 2 , Restrepo Z 63 , Rutishauser E 64 , Salim KA 65 , Salomão RP 66 , Samsoedin I 67 , Sheil D 7 , Sierra R 68 , Silveira M 69 , Slik JW 64 , Steel L 70 , Taedoumg H 6 , Tan S 71 , Terborgh JW 32 , Thomas SC 72 , Toledo M 73 , Umunay PM 74 , Gamarra LV 5 , Vieira IC 66 , Vos VA 58 , Wang O 75 , Willcock S 76 , Zemagho L 6

Affiliations 

  • 1 School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • 2 Université Paul Sabatier CNRS, Toulouse, France
  • 3 Department of Geography, University College London, London, UK
  • 4 United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK
  • 5 Jardín Botánico de Missouri, Oxapampa, Perú
  • 6 Plant Systematic and Ecology Laboratory, University of Yaounde I, Cameroon
  • 7 CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia
  • 8 Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands
  • 9 Agence Nationale des Parcs Nationaux, Libreville, Gabon
  • 10 Mensuration Unit, Forestry Commission of Ghana, Kumasi, Ghana
  • 11 Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Kagoshima University, Japan
  • 12 Instituto de Biodiversidade e Floresta, Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará, Santarém, Brazil
  • 13 Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso, Nova Xavantina, Brazil
  • 14 Center for Tropical Conservation, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
  • 15 Red para la Mitigación y Adaptación al Cambio Climático de la UNAD, Bogota, Colombia
  • 16 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Brazil
  • 17 Geography, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  • 18 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
  • 19 Programa de Ciencias del Agro y el Mar, Herbario Universitario, Barinas, Venezuela
  • 20 CIFOR, Conakry, Guinea
  • 21 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Penicuik, UK
  • 22 International Center for Tropical Botany, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
  • 23 UMR AMAP, IRD, Montpellier, France
  • 24 The University of Edinburgh, School of GeoSciences, Edinburgh, UK
  • 25 Biodiversity and Landscape Unit, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Université de Liège, Gembloux, Belgium
  • 26 INRA, UMR EEF, Champenoux, France
  • 27 Forest Ecology and Forest Management group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
  • 28 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Projeto Dinâmica Biológica de Fragmentos Florestais, Manaus, Brazil
  • 29 Herbario Alfredo Paredes, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador
  • 30 Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Cusco, Perú
  • 31 Rougier-Gabon, Libreville, Gabon
  • 32 Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
  • 33 Jardín Botánico Joaquín Antonio Uribe, Medellín, Colombia
  • 34 Inventory &Monitoring Program, National Park Service, Fredericksburg, VA, USA
  • 35 Andes to Amazon Biodiversity Program, Puerto Maldonado, Perú
  • 36 Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Perúana, Iquitos, Perú
  • 37 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA
  • 38 Landscape Ecology and Vegetal Production Systems Unit, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
  • 39 Department of Botany &Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
  • 40 Forest Ressources Management, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Belgium
  • 41 Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA
  • 42 Wildlife Conservation Society-DR Congo, Kinshasa I, Democratic Republic of Congo
  • 43 Centro de Ecologia, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientificas, Caracas, Venezuela
  • 44 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panamá, Republic of Panama
  • 45 Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  • 46 Lukuru Wildlife Research Foundation, Kinshasa, Gombe, Democratic Republic of Congo
  • 47 Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bogor, Indonesia
  • 48 Tropical Peat Research Institute, Biological Research Division, Malaysian Palm Oil Board, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 49 Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
  • 50 Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Sciences and College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia
  • 51 Wildlife Conservation Society, Kampala, Uganda
  • 52 Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
  • 53 Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques, Université de Kisangani, Kisangani, Democratic Republic of Congo
  • 54 School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • 55 Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil
  • 56 Flamingo Land Ltd, Kirby Misperton, UK
  • 57 Sabah Forestry Department, Sabah, Malaysia
  • 58 Universidad Autónoma del Beni, Riberalta, Bolivia
  • 59 CIRAD, UMR Ecologie des Forêts de Guyane, Sinamary, French Guiana, France
  • 60 Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 61 Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
  • 62 Bureau Waardenburg, The Netherlands
  • 63 Fundación Con Vida, Medellín, Colombia
  • 64 Carboforexpert, Geneva, Switzerland
  • 65 Environmental and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei, Darussalam
  • 66 Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belém, Brazil
  • 67 FORDA, The Ministry of Forestry and Environment, Bogor, Indonesia
  • 68 GeoIS, Quito, Ecuador
  • 69 Museu Universitário, Universidade Federal do Acre, Brazil
  • 70 World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, USA
  • 71 CTFS-AA Asia Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
  • 72 Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • 73 Instituto Boliviano de Investigación Forestal, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia
  • 74 Yale School of Forestry &Environmental Studies, New Haven, CT, USA
  • 75 School of Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff AZ, USA
  • 76 Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Sci Rep, 2017 01 17;7:39102.
PMID: 28094794 DOI: 10.1038/srep39102

Abstract

Tropical forests are global centres of biodiversity and carbon storage. Many tropical countries aspire to protect forest to fulfil biodiversity and climate mitigation policy targets, but the conservation strategies needed to achieve these two functions depend critically on the tropical forest tree diversity-carbon storage relationship. Assessing this relationship is challenging due to the scarcity of inventories where carbon stocks in aboveground biomass and species identifications have been simultaneously and robustly quantified. Here, we compile a unique pan-tropical dataset of 360 plots located in structurally intact old-growth closed-canopy forest, surveyed using standardised methods, allowing a multi-scale evaluation of diversity-carbon relationships in tropical forests. Diversity-carbon relationships among all plots at 1 ha scale across the tropics are absent, and within continents are either weak (Asia) or absent (Amazonia, Africa). A weak positive relationship is detectable within 1 ha plots, indicating that diversity effects in tropical forests may be scale dependent. The absence of clear diversity-carbon relationships at scales relevant to conservation planning means that carbon-centred conservation strategies will inevitably miss many high diversity ecosystems. As tropical forests can have any combination of tree diversity and carbon stocks both require explicit consideration when optimising policies to manage tropical carbon and biodiversity.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.