Affiliations 

  • 1 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA; Amsterdam UMC, Heart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • 2 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
  • 3 Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
  • 4 University Hospital St. Ekaterina, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 5 SUSCCH, a.s., Banska Bystrica, Slovakia
  • 6 Sarawak Heart Centre, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • 7 Nemocnice na Homolce - Kardiologie, Prague, Czech Republic
  • 8 MBAL St. Ivan Rilski, Dupnitsa, Bulgaria
  • 9 Alhyatt Cardiovascular Center and Tanta University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt
  • 10 Breda Amphia, Breda, the Netherlands
  • 11 Hospital of Invasive Cardiology IKARDIA, Lublin/Nałęczów, Poland
  • 12 Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Spain
  • 13 T. Bata Regional Hospital Zlin, Zlin, Czech Republic
  • 14 Al-Dorrah Heart Center, Cairo, Egypt
  • 15 Karlovarská krajská nemocnice a.s., Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic
  • 16 Bina Waluya Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • 17 Conquest Hospital, East Sussex, United Kingdom
  • 18 Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • 19 Hospital Universitario Burgos, Burgos, Spain
  • 20 University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
  • 21 Hospital Queen Elizabeth II, Sabah, Malaysia
  • 22 Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong
  • 23 Amsterdam UMC, Heart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • 24 San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • 25 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: roxana.mehran@mountsinai.org
Am J Cardiol, 2020 07 15;127:1-8.
PMID: 32418717 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.04.014

Abstract

Older patients who undergo coronary interventions are at greater risk of ischemic events and less likely to tolerate prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) due to bleeding risk. The COMBO biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent promotes rapid endothelialization through endothelial progenitor cell capture technology which may be advantageous in elderly patients. We compared 1-year clinical outcomes and DAPT cessation events in patients >75 versus ≤75 years from the MASCOT registry. MASCOT was a prospective, multicenter cohort study of all-comers undergoing attempted COMBO stenting. The primary endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF), composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) not clearly attributed to a nontarget vessel or clinically driven target lesion revascularization. Bleeding was adjudicated using the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. Adjusted outcomes were analyzed using Cox regression methods. The study included 18% (n = 479) patients >75 years and 72% (n = 2,135) patients ≤75 years. One-year TLF occurred in 4.6% patients >75 years versus 3.1% patients ≤75years of age, p = 0.10; adj hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence intervals 0.77 to 2.38, p = 0.29. There were no significant differences in cardiac death (1.7% vs 1.3%, p = 0.55), MI (2.1% vs 1.2%, p = 0.14), target lesion revascularization (1.7% vs 1.4%, p = 0.60) and definite stent thrombosis (0.8% vs 0.4%, p = 0.19). Major Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3,5 bleeding (3.1% vs 1.5%, p = 0.01) and DAPT cessation rates (32.4% vs 23.0%, p <0.001) were significantly higher in elderly patients. In conclusion, elderly patients >75 years treated with COMBO stents had similar TLF but significantly greater incidence of bleeding than younger patients and DAPT cessation in one-third of patients over 1 year.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.