Affiliations 

  • 1 Laboratory of Parasitology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
  • 2 Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • 3 Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Medical Laboratories, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • 4 The Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, Georgia, United States of America
  • 5 Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
  • 6 Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
  • 7 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
  • 8 PATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
  • 9 Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
  • 10 Children Without Worms, Decatur, Georgia, United States of America
  • 11 Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
  • 12 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
  • 13 QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, Australia
  • 14 Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
  • 15 Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
  • 16 Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
  • 17 The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  • 18 Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
  • 19 Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, United States of America
  • 20 Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2020 Jun;14(6):e0008231.
PMID: 32544158 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008231

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are increasingly being used as diagnostic tools for soil-transmitted helminths (STHs; Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, Necator americanus, Ancylostoma duodenale and A. ceylanicum), Strongyloides stercoralis and Schistosoma in human stool. Currently, there is a large diversity of NAATs being applied, but an external quality assessment scheme (EQAS) for these diagnostics is lacking. An EQAS involves a blinded process where test results reported by a laboratory are compared to those reported by reference or expert laboratories, allowing for an objective assessment of the diagnostic performance of a laboratory. In the current study, we piloted an international EQAS for these helminths (i) to investigate the feasibility of designing and delivering an EQAS; (ii) to assess the diagnostic performance of laboratories; and (iii) to gain insights into the different NAAT protocols used.

METHODS AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A panel of twelve stool samples and eight DNA samples was validated by six expert laboratories for the presence of six helminths (Ascaris, Trichuris, N. americanus, Ancylostoma, Strongyloides and Schistosoma). Subsequently this panel was sent to 15 globally dispersed laboratories. We found a high degree of diversity among the different DNA extraction and NAAT protocols. Although most laboratories performed well, we could clearly identify the laboratories that were poorly performing.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We showed the technical feasibility of an international EQAS for the NAAT of STHs, Strongyloides and Schistosoma. In addition, we documented that there are clear benefits for participating laboratories, as they can confirm and/or improve the diagnostic performance of their NAATs. Further research should aim to identify factors that explain poor performance of NAATs.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.