Affiliations 

  • 1 From the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) (O.O., E.O., M.S., R.Z.)
  • 2 Brazilian Society of Cardiology (C.A.)
  • 3 The Public Health Foundation of India, Indian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad (R.A.)
  • 4 Hospital do Coração (O.B.)
  • 5 University of Calgary (N.C.)
  • 6 Sunway University; University of Malaya; and Malaysian Society of Hypertension (Y.-C.C.)
  • 7 Eduardo Mondlane University (A.D.)
  • 8 Heart Institute of Ho Chi Minh City (T.N.P.D.)
  • 9 PASCAR, University of Yaounde (A.T.D.)
  • 10 CCUL, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa (M.F.)
  • 11 Novartis Foundation (F.M.)
  • 12 London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (D.N.)
  • 13 New York University Langone Medical Center (G.O.)
  • 14 Belarusian Hypertension Society, Vitebsk State Medical University (V.P.)
  • 15 Jewish General Hospital, McGill University (E.L.S.)
  • 16 Centro de Estudos de Medicina Baseada na Evidência, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal (A.V.C.)
  • 17 FHI360, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (P.L.)
Hypertension, 2019 05;73(5):990-997.
PMID: 30929516 DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11916

Abstract

High blood pressure is the leading modifiable risk factor for mortality, accounting for nearly 1 in 5 deaths worldwide and 1 in 11 in low-income countries. Hypertension control remains a challenge, especially in low-resource settings. One approach to improvement is the prioritization of patient-centered care. However, consensus on the outcomes that matter most to patients is lacking. We aimed to define a standard set of patient-centered outcomes for evaluating hypertension management in low- and middle-income countries. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement convened a Working Group of 18 experts and patients representing 15 countries. We used a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on a set of outcomes, case-mix variables, and a timeline to guide data collection. Literature reviews, patient interviews, a patient validation survey, and an open review by hypertension experts informed the set. The set contains 18 clinical and patient-reported outcomes that reflect patient priorities and evidence-based hypertension management and case-mix variables to allow comparisons between providers. The domains included are hypertension control, cardiovascular complications, health-related quality of life, financial burden of care, medication burden, satisfaction with care, health literacy, and health behaviors. We present a core list of outcomes for evaluating hypertension care. They account for the unique challenges healthcare providers and patients face in low- and middle-income countries, yet are relevant to all settings. We believe that it is a vital step toward international benchmarking in hypertension care and, ultimately, value-based hypertension management.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications