Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 2 Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, China
  • 3 Department of Cardiology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • 4 Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
  • 5 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 6 Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • 7 Department of Medicine, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • 8 Imperial College, National Health Service (NHS) Trust, London, UK
  • 9 Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore
  • 10 Health Economics Program, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • 11 Observational Research Centre, Global Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Madrid, Spain
  • 12 Department of Biometrics, AstraZeneca K.K, Osaka, Japan
  • 13 Department of Cardiology, Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching, Malaysia
Clin Cardiol, 2020 Sep;43(9):999-1008.
PMID: 32618009 DOI: 10.1002/clc.23400

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite guideline recommendations, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is frequently used for longer than 1 year after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event. In Asia, information on antithrombotic management patterns (AMPs), including DAPT post discharge, is sparse. This analysis evaluated real-world AMPs up to 2 years post discharge for ACS.

HYPOTHESIS: There is wide variability in AMP use for ACS management in Asia.

METHODS: EPICOR Asia (NCT01361386) is a prospective observational study of patients discharged after hospitalization for an ACS in eight countries/regions in Asia, followed up for 2 years. Here, we describe AMPs used and present an exploratory analysis of characteristics and outcomes in patients who received DAPT for ≤12 months post discharge compared with >12 months.

RESULTS: Data were available for 12 922 patients; of 11 639 patients discharged on DAPT, 2364 (20.3%) received DAPT for ≤12 months and 9275 (79.7%) for >12 months, with approximately 60% still on DAPT at 2 years. Patients who received DAPT for >12 months were more likely to be younger, obese, lower Killip class, resident in India (vs China), and to have received invasive reperfusion. Clinical event rates during year 2 of follow-up were lower in patients with DAPT >12 vs ≤12 months, but no causal association can be implied in this non-randomized study.

CONCLUSIONS: Most ACS patients remained on DAPT up to 1 year, in accordance with current guidelines, and over half remained on DAPT at 2 years post discharge. Patients not on DAPT at 12 months are a higher risk group requiring careful monitoring.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.